posted by [identity profile] realinterrobang.livejournal.com at 11:00pm on 2005-08-07
Funny, I have sort of the opposite opinion. Seems to me, in this culture, female nudity is generally considered "art," whereas male nudity is generally considered "pornography." Some exceptions apply, and YMMV, of course. This probably fits in nicely with the thriving substrain of the species who couldn't see an attractive line on a male chassis if it were pointed out to them with calipers.

Then again, I'm a terrible curmudgeon and I don't really want to see people breastfeeding in public, either. It falls under the "necessary evil" category, something I'm willing to tolerate, but I don't like it. OTOH, that probably has less to do with my opinion of breasts than my opinion of infants in general. I like breasts just fine, having two of rather copious size. Infants I can live without, and am intending on doing so...

Nevertheless, to censor a Michaelangelo mural? That's kind of weird. If I were that artist, I'd paint a really raucously-coloured, obviously added-in bikini top on the topless Eve, making sure to carefully highlight where the nipples ought to be (but not enough so as to be tremendously overt), and call it good. Maybe paint a banner underneath that said, "Censored by order of the city council" in Latin or something. I'm with Jello Biafra here, where he says that one of the best ways of fighting ineluctable censorship is to make it really, really obvious that it's going on.

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31