eftychia: Me in kilt and poofy shirt, facing away, playing acoustic guitar behind head (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] eftychia at 11:10pm on 2004-03-01

I don't watch "reality television" (what's any more "real" aout it than a traditional game show on a soundstage anyhow?), and I don't watch dating shows ... but I was curious what the "twist" was going to be in Average Joe. I figured they'd have to save it for the last third of the show, so I didn't have to sit through much of it to find out ... if I guessed wrong and tuned in too late, no big deal.

Okay, I saw the revelation of the big secret, and the reaction to it ... and I don't get it.

Not only do I fail to identify, I haven't even manage to make sense of it intellectually. Is this something I would understand if I'd seen other episodes of the show? I got the impression it was something "any guy" would automatically understand, but I am utterly baffled. (Though if it really is something nearly universal, it wouldn't be the first thing I don't understand about men.)

[Edit: Added description of the big secret....]

The twist turned out to be her revelation (to the hunk she'd picked, after they were wherever they got flown off to) that her ex-boyfriend was Fabio. And this proved to be so terrible that the hunk wound up rejecting her -- and he looked really shaken up. He said, "Ask any guy and they'll understand what I'm feeling."

Is there something I don't know about Fabio other than his being an uberhunk and a model for cheezy romance novel cover art? Is having a bird break your nose contagious and your lovers carriers? Colour me clueless.

There are 20 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
coraline: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] coraline at 08:15pm on 2004-03-01
care to let those of us who have no idea what's going on in on the "twist"?
 
posted by [identity profile] vvalkyri.livejournal.com at 08:24pm on 2004-03-01
seconded.
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 08:26pm on 2004-03-01
I've added a description, and a cut-tag to make it spoiler-safe.
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 08:27pm on 2004-03-01
Revelation of the twist added ...
 
posted by [identity profile] marnanel.livejournal.com at 08:37pm on 2004-03-01
I haven't seen it, either, but from the description I don't get it. (I don't even know who Fabio is, though.)
 
posted by [identity profile] silmaril.livejournal.com at 08:37pm on 2004-03-01
I read the spoiler, and I don't get it, either.

But my overall reaction can be summed up as "Whatever..." :-)
siderea: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] siderea at 08:45pm on 2004-03-01
Usually I'm the next-best-thing to a guy, but clearly I don't cut it in this instance.
 
posted by [identity profile] blumindy.livejournal.com at 08:45pm on 2004-03-01
" (Though if it really is something nearly universal, it wouldn't be the first thing I don't understand about men.)"

*(SNERK!!!)*
I'd say I'm with you on the clueless meter. I wish I could say that the new hunk was turned off at her bad taste and didn't want to be lumped into that category (if only people ever really thought that way....) But my guess is that he's intimidated (and who would know more about guys feeling that way than I?) He's also an idiot.....but then, he's dating ON A GAME SHOW!!!!! So it isn't as if his idiocy is news to us. At least he isn't making government policy.........


More Tim Robbins, less Fabio; make the world a better place......
 
posted by [identity profile] vvalkyri.livejournal.com at 08:46pm on 2004-03-01
er, um?
Best I can come up with is either an inferiority complex for fear of not measuring up in the muscle department or a fear that she'll expect him to grow his hair long and carry a fan around to make it always blowy.
 
posted by [identity profile] doubleplus.livejournal.com at 09:01pm on 2004-03-01
I can only vaguely guess that the previous suggestions are probably right, though it is pretty mystifying.

However, I think you've missed an important distinction -- he said any guy would understand, not any man. I'm not sure exactly what guys are, but I've gotten the idea from the media that they're a certain type of male creature that share strong (perhaps extreme) enthusiasm for sports, and certain attitudes toward women (excuse me, "chicks") and various other characteristics. As far as I can tell, I have never been a guy, so it doesn't trouble me that I fail to understand this particular piece of guy-groupthink.
 
posted by [identity profile] angelovernh.livejournal.com at 09:07pm on 2004-03-01
I didn't get it either. Wouldn't he be flattered???
weofodthignen: selfportrait with Rune the cat (Default)
posted by [personal profile] weofodthignen at 09:28pm on 2004-03-01
Umm. Isn't he one of those gorgeous specimens that men tend to assume are gay?

M who has never dated anyway enters the minefield of sexual politics
 
posted by [identity profile] jim-p.livejournal.com at 11:00pm on 2004-03-01
Funny, I never even saw the show but from your description I figured it out right away.

It comes from the perpetual male insecurity about "measuring up" against other guys. Of course, each of us "measures" differently, so what's obvious to one is mysterious to the other.

What I'm guessing this guy was thinking is this: "My god, she's dated a fscking *celebrity!* Compared to that how am I *ever* going to measure up?! She may like what she sees now, but sooner or later she's going to see that I'm not as good as her Celebrity Lover. Better to bail now than to face the music later... bye!"

Guys have this idea that women are mercenary about sex and relationships; they're holding out for the "best offer". They may like you for now, but if a better offer comes along they'll drop you in a flash. In this case, the hunk feels that she's already *seen* a Really Stupendous Offer. While Hunk may be able to dazzle her for a time, sooner or later he feels that she's going to realize that Fabio was the better offer and go back to him, humiliating Hunk in the process. Better to leave with one's dignity intact now than to face greater humiliation later.

Weird... this is so obvious to me... am I that conventional?
gingicat: deep purple lilacs, some buds, some open (Default)
posted by [personal profile] gingicat at 03:56am on 2004-03-02
No, you have knowledge of mundane thought processes.

I agree; the mundane view of What Women Want matches this, and it's always baffled me. Which is why Queer Eye for the Straight Guy baffles me, too; sure, I'd love it if [livejournal.com profile] teddywolf dressed up a bit more and was less likely to create clutter, but it's not necessary for me to love him, and I'd rather he be comfortable and *himself* than trying to be something he's not.
 
posted by [identity profile] madbodger.livejournal.com at 07:13am on 2004-03-02
My guess as to the line of "thought" involved is this:


"Woman have left me for real creeps, and *this* woman has
left Fabio for me. Obviously I'm just a stepping-stone, again."


No, that doesn't wash, most typical guys' emotions don't
manage that sort of indirect logic.

 
posted by [identity profile] leiacat.livejournal.com at 08:05am on 2004-03-02
My guess is the target's insecurity. It's not that uncommon for people to entertain the thoughts of one's partner's previous partners, and wondering if they might be in some way not as good. Fabio is theoretically a walking cliche of manly and desirable, so I'm guessing the guy couldn't handle being compared to _that_, since it has to be nearly impossible to measure up.
 
posted by [identity profile] anniemal.livejournal.com at 10:57am on 2004-03-02
You're a "guy"? Or "average"? (Ooh, evil gleam in eyes.) I'm still trying to understand why you had an iota of curiosity. I'm quite sure Fabio couldn't put a patch on you for fun.

Odd. I haven't ever noticed insecurity in you. Just body-induced annoyance. Odd. I have never considered Fabio attractive. ^shrug^

I probably wouldn't have got the point of the show either, would've got it wrong, or would've wandered off to see whether there were any chips or cookies. A confused semi-guy.

Thumb improves.
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 11:18am on 2004-03-02
Didn't say I was a guy; just that it wouldn't be the first time I've failed to understand guys.

I'm not sure why I was curious either ... mostly that morbid car-crash fascination, wondering what deep secret would be important enough to count.

I do have insecurities. Just not the one explained in other folks' answers here.
 
posted by [identity profile] anniemal.livejournal.com at 09:38pm on 2004-03-02
Oop, sorry. I was reading too fast and missed the parenthetical bit. Damned if I can begin to figure out men, or women, or where one leaves off and the other begins either. Other aminals are way easier, if less interesting.

But this discussion gives me pause while I consider why I favour men who are computer geeks, dance, play early or folk music, and wear skirts at least sometimes.

I've either found my groove or got into a rut. Oh wait, it's springish. Forget I said that.

I still can't understand the shoe thing, though. Oh, well.
 
posted by [identity profile] landkurt.livejournal.com at 02:07pm on 2004-03-03
So I take it she went for a hunk and not an average joe. I suspect his hunkiness is important to him, something he works at and is proud of. When he found out she had previously rejected the Alpha-Hunk, Fabio, his insecurities at being compared to the ultimate hunk made him reject her and run for hiding. He realized either he would never measure up to that standard or that she had already seen through the sham of the uber hunk and it was no use.

A better reason to write off a woman you found out was previously in a relationship with Fabio: she must be shallow to be attracted to such phony perfection and the celebrity status of a Hollywood B-star. This reasoning fails since we have no way of knowing what Fabio is really like. While the odds are that his looks and celebrity status have given him serious problems, he could actually be a sweet and caring guy. It's easier to believe that someone that seems to have it all must really be shallow and stuck up and that anyone in a relationship with them must be equally messed up.

Still, Interesting that Hollywood felt that this revelation would be a shocker. Seems kind of anticlimactic to me.

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31